Let Goals Become Clear, Let Performance Grow Stronger
Manage Performance With a System, Not Intuition
Goal Setting and Tracking
Individual, team, and company goals are defined in a single system. Goals are broken down using KPI and OKR logic, and progress is tracked visibly throughout the period.
Recorded Feedback
Manager evaluations, employee self-assessments, and in-period feedback are gathered in one place. Critical comments don't stay verbal, they become part of the performance record.
Fair and Structured Evaluation
Performance cycles, competency sets, and evaluation steps are managed systematically. Every employee is evaluated within the same framework.
Make Performance Management Measurable
Goals Are Defined, Broken Down, and Tracked
The Evaluation Framework Is Designed for Your Company
Performance Results Turn Into Development
Turn Performance From Clutter
Into a Corporate System
- Goals are set at the start of the period and tracked throughout the process
- Self-assessment, manager evaluation, and 360 feedback are managed in the same flow
- Evaluation processes work as a standard for every employee
- Performance conversations and development actions are put on record
- Past-period performance data is stored as institutional memory
- Calibration and reporting processes proceed with more control
Individual and team goals are defined, progress is tracked throughout the process.
Evaluation periods are planned, all parties are included in the process.
Feedback is recorded in the system instantly or periodically, it's never lost.
Performance data is linked with development plans to provide long-term tracking.
How Does the Performance Process Work End to End?
Goal progress is updated, managers and employees add notes, observations, and feedback throughout the process.
Self-assessment, manager evaluation, and, if needed, 360 feedback steps are activated in the defined period.
Performance results are reported, calibration is done across teams, and development areas are clarified.
Are These Happening in Your Performance Process?
Goals are defined at the start of the period but aren't tracked during the process.
Feedback given by managers stays verbal or gets lost in scattered notes.
Without a common standard, the sense of fairness is damaged, and results stop being comparable.
Previous period evaluations, development areas, and performance history remain scattered.
We Answer the Questions on Your Mind
Periodic performance evaluation, goal-based evaluation, and feedback processes can all be managed through AIRA HRM. The process is defined in the system according to the evaluation model your company uses.
Individual goals are defined in the system at the start of the period. These goals can be linked to team or company goals. Progress is tracked throughout the process, and at the end of the period it's clearly visible how much of the goal was achieved.
The evaluation process can be set up to include the employee, the direct manager, and the HR team. Which parties will be included in the process and which steps they'll complete is defined in the system in advance.
Managers and employees can enter their feedback directly into the system. All feedback is recorded with a timestamp. No feedback that stays verbal goes unrecorded in the system.
Yes. Different evaluation criteria and weightings can be defined for each department or position. This way, the sales team and the software team can be evaluated fairly using different criteria.
Yes. Period-based performance results, goal completion rates, team averages, and individual development data can be reported. Managers can view team performance on a single screen.
Yes. Evaluation results reveal development areas. This data can be linked with training planning to create a personalized development roadmap for each employee.
Yes. In AIRA HRM, evaluation forms and criteria can be customized to your company's needs. We work together during onboarding to bring your existing evaluation structure into the system.



